IRAN’S FOREIGN POLICY THE QUESTION OF NATIONAL INTEREST IN IRAN’S FOREIGN POLICY

A CONSTRUCTIVIST PERSPECTIVE

  • Raziq Hussain QAU
  • Qandil Abbas QAU
Keywords: Foreign Policy, National Interest, Constructivism, State Identity, Realism, Social Construction

Abstract

Given that the Islamic Republic of Iran (IRI) is a nation state with a streak of Islamic-revolutionary transnationalism, the question of national interest has appeared to be quite a perplexing issue for both analysts and researchers of Iranian foreign policy.  What lies at the heart of this issue is whether ideology and national interest or, say, idealism and realism can coexist or not. This debate, in turn, revolves around how the term national interest is defined. If it is viewed, for example, through the prism of materialist-rationalist theories, Iran seems, in many cases, to be acting against its own national interests which is—from the perspective of Iranian leaders—not the case. Against this general theoretical background, this article argues for a constructivist interpretation of national interest as an appropriate approach in dealing with the question of national interest in Iran’s foreign policy, arguing that the country’s conception of its national interest is based essentially on its perception of the “Self,” and that it sees no contradiction between its transnational ideological objectives and national interests. 

References

. Hans J. Morgenthau, Politics among Nations: the Struggle for Power and Peace (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc. 1948), 13.

. Kenneth N. Waltz, “The Origin of War in Neorealist Theory,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 18, issue 4, The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars (spring 1988): 624.

. Ibid., 619.

. Martin Griffiths, Terry O’Callaghan and Steven C. Roach, International Relations: The Key Concepts, 2nd ed. (New York: Routledge, 2008), 217.

. Alexander Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 199), 92.

. For a quick review of definitional issues surrounding the term ‘national interest’ see, among others, Joseph Frankel, National Interest (London: Macmillan and Company Limited, 1970), 15-52. For a general review of how ‘national interest’ is treated in IR theories see, Scott Burchill, The National Interest in International Relations Theory (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).

. Griffiths, O’Callaghan and Roach, International Relations, 216.

. James N. Rosenau, The Study of World Politics 1, Theoretical and Methodological Challenges (New York: Routledge, 2006), 246.

. Ibid., 34.

. Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckman, The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge (London: Penguin Books LTD., 1966), 70.

. Berger and Luckman, Social Construction of Reality, 78.

. For details about the dialectical process see, Berger and Luckman, The Social Construction of Reality, 78, Berger, The Social Reality of Religion (England: Penguin University Books, 1973),13-14, Berger and Stanley Pullberg, ‘Reification and the Sociological Critique of Consciousness’, History and Theory 4, No. 2 (1965), 199-200.

. Emanuel Adler, “Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates” in Handbook of International Relations, 2nd ed., eds. Walter Carlesnaes, Thomas Risse, and Beth A. Simmons (London: Sage Publications Ltd., 2013), 121.

. Stefano Guzzini, Power, Realism and Constructivism (New York: Routledge, 2013), 215.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 309.

. Wendt, “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46, No. 2 (Spring, 1992): 391.

. Ibid., 43.

. Christian Reus-Smit, “Constructivism” in Theories of International Relations, 4th ed., eds. Scott Burchill et al. (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), 216.

. Jutta Weldes, “Constructing National Interests,” European Journal of International Relations 2, no. 3 (1996): 276.

. Adler, “Constructivism in International Relations,” 123.

. Weldes, “Constructing National Interests,” 280.

. Joseph Frankel, National Interest (London: Macmillan and Company Limited, 1970), 142.

. K. J. Holsti, International Politics: A Framework for Analysis (New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, INC., 1967), 126.

. Weldes, “Constructing National Interests,” 276.

. Ibid., 282.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 113.

. Wendt, “Anarchy is what states make of it,” 397.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 225.

. Wendt, “Anarchy is what states make of it,” 401.

. Weldes, “Constructing National Interests,” 280.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 224.

. Ted Hopf, “Identity, legitimacy, and the Use of Military Force: Russia’s Great Power Identities and Military Intervention in Abkhazia,” Review of International Studies 31, Force and Legitimacy in World Politics, (December 2005): 227.

. Hopf, “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,” International Security 23, No. 1 (Summer 1998): 195.

. Berger and Luckman, Social Construction of Reality, 153.

. Hopf, “Identity, legitimacy, and the Use of Military Force,” 236.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 118.

. Hopf, “The Promise of Constructivism,” 174-75.

. Wendt, Social Theory of International Politics, 230.

. Ibid., 231.

. Ibid., 316.

. Seyed Jalal Dehghan Firoozabadi, “Ontological Security and the Foreign Policy Analysis of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Iranian Review of Foreign Affairs 2, No. 2 (Summer 2011): 31.

. M. R. Dehshiri and M. R. Majid, “Iran’s Foreign Policy in Post-Revolution Era: A Holistic Approach,” The Iranian Journal of International Affairs XXI, No.1-2 (Winter-Spring 2008-09): 102.

. Firoozabadi, “Ontological Security and Foreign Policy Analysis of the Islamic Republic of Iran,” 55.

. Berger and Luckman, Social Construction of Reality, 108.

. Dr. Yadollah Javani, “Chara Dushman Dareem? (Why do We have Enemies?),” Weekly Sobhe Sadegh, 18th Year, no. 810 (Murdad 16, 1396/August 7, 2017): 1-2.

. “Iran's Rouhani calls for Muslims to unite against United States,” Reuters, November. 24, 2018,

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-usa-rouhani/irans-rouhani-calls-for-muslims-to-unite-against-united-states-idUSKCN1NT080.

. Ayatollah Khamenei, “Everything in Conflict with Our Islam, Our Revolution, Our Rich Historical Background is Not Part of National Interests,” Khamenei.ir, June 12, 2017,

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/4925/Everything-in-Conflict-with-Our-Islam-Our-Revolution-Our-Rich.

. Ibid.

. Ibid.

. Shabnam J. Holliday, Defining Iran: Politics of Resistance (England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2011), 2.

. Holliday, Defining Iran, 2.

. Ibid., 38.

. Meir Litvak, “The construction of Iranian national identity: An overview,” in Constructing Nationalism in Iran: From the Qajars to the Islamic Republic, ed. Meir Litvak (New York: Routledge, 2017), 16.

. Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works, Sahifeh-ye Imam, vol. 19, Trans. Mansoor Limba (Tehran: The Institute for Compilation and Publication of Imam Khomeini’s Works, 2008), 138.

. For a detailed account of the principle of maslaha see, Raziq Hussain, “How the Principle of Maslaha can Guide the Foreign Policy of a Muslim State, Noor-e-Marefat 11, issue 2 (April-June 2020): 20-35.

. Sahifeh-ye Imam, vol. 21, 335.

. “Iran: Rafsanjani proposes referendum for resumption of ties with US,” Payvand Iran News, December 4, 2003,

http://www.payvand.com/news/03/apr/1049.html.

. Khamenei, “Leader’s Speech to Government Officials,” Khamenei.ir, July 24, 2012,

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/1655/Leader-s-Speech-to-Government-Officials.

. Khamenei, “Leader’s Address to MPs,” Khamenei.ir, June 8, 2010,

http://english.khamenei.ir/news/1311/Leader-s-Address-to-MPs

Published
2021-02-10